|
Only 7 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago)
Suggestion: Payments: For example: |
|
Only 7 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago)
Suggestion: Payments: For example: |
|
Stoneisland 248 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) +100 |
|
Ralf 218 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) A big NO. Strictly my personal opinion about loans in the game |
Adrian09 143 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) Player value is given by clubs, its an average of money paid for transfer for a similar player. This is just a scam idea , where, someone can raise at its will player value, get a high load and never returning since player might worth less. Things are simply, a player worth as much as someone is willing to pay, its not a fixed priced. |
|
b1c10 121 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) Imagine the following scenario: what happens if the player isn't sold? Does he simply return to the team or system hold and relist to sell again or does he disappear? Which contradicts what the title says about "guarranted". For this reason, I didn't think it was a good idea, as it leaves a gap without a solution. |
maridiba 334 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) I totally agree with @Adrian09, using a player as collateral for a loan would be stupid; a couple of days ago, I sold a young 1-star defender (Tuan Ho) for 2€, and its reported worth is an unrealistic 6.1€. I could have easily stolen 4€ from the funds I don't think loans are necessary for the game, but in principle, the idea could be implemented without risks, just by changing a few things: edited on (4 times)
|
Thuru 494 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) This is a big no. No needed suggestion what Reduce partner funds. Instead of that better suggestion what increase that. |
|
Only 7 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) The parameters can be modified; you're left with the numbers and not the underlying concept. I also know that people with certain ideologies will say NO simply because of their religion. I would appreciate it if those people refrained from commenting, as their opinion is ideological and not about the game. With my greatest respect edited on (1 times)
|
|
Only 7 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago)
@Adrian09
When I refer to the player's value, I mean a "real" value, but anyway, that's just changing values. I would appreciate it if you focused on the concept and not the numbers, that's up to the admin discretion. |
Bolado 10 posts 1 year old |
on (3 months ago) Excelent idea |
|
nicmo 509 posts 4 years old |
on (3 months ago) it would have to be a very very complex system to make sure the game itself (the fund that would lend) would not get cheated by the managers. For a 2 season loan i don't see the benefit for the manager, a small team moves little money, a big team moves a lot of money, calculating how much can be loan can be very tricky. In my opinion, we would expose the game to a crazy amount of problems for little gain. |
|
Jonah.Rifai 1 posts 3 months old |
on (3 months ago) i want to loan |
We gebruiken cookies om ervoor te zorgen dat je de best mogelijke ervaring krijgt. Door KickoffBoss te gebruiken, ga je akkoord met ons Privacybeleid.
We gebruiken cookies om je ervaring te verbeteren. Kies welke soorten cookies je wilt toestaan:
Noodzakelijk voor de juiste werking van de website. Kan niet worden uitgeschakeld.
Help ons begrijpen hoe je onze site gebruikt (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity).
Gebruikt voor advertenties en functies voor sociale media (Meta Pixel).