Hello,

I think would be cool if we can change player role for a cost, as an example, a striker, for a cost to be able to become a middfielder but to not be anymore a striker. Since when we pull a youth, skill come random, and sometimes, some pulls are very good on some type of skills which fits another position, so, instead to work hard to balance them and be good on their initial position, they can adapt . It will create more income to game and people might even pull more them since they can surely fit a position.

Positions should be random. then there will be income for the game

Well then, maybe would be better to have random field position (gk, def, mid, att) and random position (left right center).

Then managers have to use the transfer market more, and changing positions like Adrian09 said is also possible for a fee. Along with adding player sides.

All this would contribute more to the game funds.

-100

Money from retrain positions are going to partners fund, this thing will only help a handfull of players while it will only cost 99% of players more money that dosen t go back to the players that are actually playing the game. Or do like this and make the funds for retrain to go to local, global and partners fund (33% each)

I agree with the random positions (C, R, L) in the various roles DF, MD, AT).

+100

+100

It could pull an idea where you can put the player wherever you want, no matter of position. Maybe we should delete positions?
For example i would like to see my DC as a CDM

Basic idea is a good one, but it needs to be improved a little

I think that the cost of training players to play in different parts of the field should be a percentage of the player's market value, for example 30% instead of 7 €, because the market value of some players is less than this amount originally.

ok