Forum > Help and Questions (International) > 4-3-3 module


SkyEagle
9 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Shouldn't this module provide for 3 central midfielders instead of just one flanked by 2 outfielders ?

Twente47
77 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Maybe add a 433A and a 433B so people can choose if they would like to play with 3 MC or with sides

Lucatortuga
8 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

+1

Sinpay*
6 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

+1

Sinpay*
6 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

+1

lysybandyta*
227 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

The game isn't so developed to keep it.

If it will be introduced there should be also an option to do LW/RW striker, instead of just SC.

In my opinion all the positions should be removed and the manager should have an option to set all the players wherever he wants. I would be glad to see my DC on mid as a CDM

nicmo
482 posts
4 years old
on (1 year ago)

good idea Twente47

GO
95 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

@nicmo, I have give that's suggestion in discord. 

Not only 433, but all formation that have 3 def or 3 mid make it have 2 option. 

3def = 3DC or DL DC DR

3mid = 3MC or ML MC MR

b1c10
103 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

@Go your suggestion is good too.

edited on (1 times)
Tsonga
27 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Yea. +1

Waggy13
39 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

GO, I mentioned it also…. guess nobody listens to us…

nicmo
482 posts
4 years old
on (1 year ago)

will "just" need to figure out how to make the same formation variation count towards the same formation xp or else it gets hard to manage multiple variations.

Claudiu23
29 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Oficial strategy îs 4-4-2 îs good for start match.

Claudiu23
29 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

And select atack center or side 

PvPNyko
113 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Nicmo, should be seperate formation XP. Else that formation has an advantage over others by having 2 choices.

Related Topics