BiSteam 46 posts 7 months old |
on 27-10-2024 09:13:20 (3 months ago) Hi everyone, I think it would be better to have a longer bench (9 instead of 7) and with free roles (not 2 of each type) I would also get to 5 substitutions for each single match so we would get even closer to reality. |
marian26 30 posts 7 months old |
on 27-10-2024 11:34:23 (3 months ago) +1 |
Spiler 40 posts 6 months old |
on 27-10-2024 12:47:35 (3 months ago) Good point, like IRL, i struggled a lot this season with 3 subs +1 |
nicmo 277 posts 3 years old |
on 27-10-2024 12:54:39 (3 months ago) something that can be done for season 7. |
Spiler 40 posts 6 months old |
on 27-10-2024 12:57:36 (3 months ago) Also I want to suggest that the 2 extra spots in terms of position should be neutral, so players can add more subs depending on their tactics (some play with 3 strickers, others with 1 and so on) |
maridiba 148 posts 7 months old |
on 27-10-2024 13:14:13 (3 months ago) I would rather set all of them neutral. Now, if you play with 4-5-1 or 5-4-1, the second spot for strikers is usually wasted. Plus, since it already requires substantial changes, it would be great if the instructions were not necessarily linked to the single bench spots and we could have a separate list. This way, we could set a player to enter at minute 45 if, let's say, the team is losing and at minute 75 under another condition. |
Chazuke_e 51 posts 7 months old |
on 27-10-2024 13:32:33 (3 months ago) Leave it at 7, else it gets unrealistic |
BiSteam 46 posts 7 months old |
on 27-10-2024 14:27:54 (3 months ago) @nicmo, ok thanks |
lysybandyta 176 posts 7 months old |
on 27-10-2024 17:37:49 (3 months ago) make all subs as neutral positions i dont need two bench strikers using 4-5-1 |
JUmpingJAckFLash14 97 posts 7 months old |
on 27-10-2024 18:21:47 (3 months ago) More substitutions = more skills for players |