Forum > Suggestions (International) > Youth Player Positions


Patrick*
8 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Youth players positions is only DL DC DR ML MR and FC

There is no option to select wether you need DLR Or DCL etc, it will be such a great idea if the position is also updated for acquiring youth players.

 

Thanks for your great work.

 

Head Coach 

Inter Miami FC

GO
95 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

You can train new position, cost 15euro


Head Coach
GO Persikabo 2024

Loretty*
59 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

I think would be better if we can choose GKDLRCMLRCSC pos.

Patrick*
8 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

I saw that, training position is more expensive than the player itself is that Normal? Maybe if it's reduced a litle bit or paid in Golf it would have be precise.

Patrick*
8 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

@Loretty That's what am also thinking about and looking forward to, getting such positions can save much time acquiring other players to fill the position.

Waggy13
39 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

The reason it’s more expensive is because having a player that can play multiple sides is more valuable than a player that can only play left, right, or center.  The better the player makes them even more valuable.

Borubar
30 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

I think it would be cool if young players had a small chance of spawning with the ability to play an extra side of the field. Like a 10% chance, so if you spawned an MC there would be 10% chance of him spawning as MLC or MRC and 1% chance of MLRC.
It would be better chance mechanics than the current wild differences between initial skills imo. Narrow the skill difference and introduce this instead.

maridiba
314 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Then there would be almost no need to buy players from the transfer market anymore. I would rather spawn players with completely random position (and also a chance for multiple positions) to have a more active players market 

Shiho
43 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

@Borubar, very bad idea. We lost 7.5e to PF and 7.5e to GF

edited on (1 times)
Goatredditor90
25 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

@Loretty there's only one Harry Maguire 

Cabbage*
62 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

In my opinion position should be a lottery, without possible to choose.

Borubar
30 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Does anyone actually pay the 15 Euro for extra position? I would be surprised, it's a big waste of money. Random chance like people discuss here sounds like a better idea overall.

nicmo
482 posts
4 years old
on (1 year ago)

if you want a true free to play game, there are other options on the internet.

Here, if managers dont spend money, then there is no prizes for winning competitions.

edited on (1 times)
Errach
43 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Well we'd still spend money on everything else. But if it's actually a popular feature I understand why you wouldn't want to remove it.

Thuru
424 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

@Borubar

There are many people who buy the extra side, or use that feature. I am one of them. Specially for high ster players its usefull or can be usefull. No need to remove it. It also give share dividend and federation income, so its fine. You can also play without using that feature, its all up to you.

Bambino
6 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

Where Patrick go? :((((

Adrian09
140 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

=))))))))))

Lucy41*
11 posts
1 year old
on (1 year ago)

It would be nicer if we had the new strategy in the game To formats How It would be 3-2-3-2 2-2-3-3 Or something similar In addition to the old ones Like the classic 4-3-3 we could do 4-2-3-2 Or other options

Related Topics