Mahmoud 50 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) It would be a lot of better if we could be able to select the role and position in youth center when buying a player |
Mahmoud 50 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) It would be a lot of better if we could be able to select the role and position in youth center when buying a player |
|
cakle 27 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) agree ---- |
|
BiSteam 53 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) At least the role, in addition I would divide the strickers into 3 roles, in addition to making it more real it would also benefit the market (for those already existing I would assign a random position) all obviously at the end of the season. |
|
Stoneisland 271 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) - - - - - It must remain this way, because then the transfer market would be cancelled out. edited on (1 times)
|
|
BiSteam 53 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) The market for strikers already seems dead to me! |
|
Stoneisland 271 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) giving positions to the attackers could be done. but it would bring further difficulty in the creation of young attackers. |
|
BiSteam 53 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) which would mean more market |
|
Errach 55 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) +1 |
|
magdy7* 17 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) We hoped that the youth system would be developed Choice of roles |
|
bigs_nuno 83 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) Currently, it's in a good balance, as the player position is divided among positions, and not having everybody creating forwarders, for example. |
maridiba 381 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) The request for strikers is low because at the beginning it was possible to select the role of the youths, and apparently people preferred to buy more strikers than they needed. It's hard to sell strikers if the clubs are already full. Regarding adding side strikers, I'm not against but such a thing should have been done at the beginning, although it would change almost nothing because SR and SL would be only used in formations with 3 strikers. How can you introduce such a big change without shocking the market? How do we deal with the existing players? Maybe it could be introduced by letting the users choose the desired position for their existing strikers |
|
villarreal 85 posts 1 year old |
on (1 year ago) I think we should be able to pick 1 out of 3 random young players in one purchase at the youth training center. That means when we buy, we will see 3 random players and only pick 1 |
|
Minecodersam 347 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) I agree only for the role, not the position. If not market will be damaged |
|
Momo025* 33 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) Buy from market |
|
Xander 32 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) +1 |
|
JUmpingJAckFLash14 224 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) we are all agree to come back but the game need more gold transaction and fees to pay earnings :) |
|
Cabbage* 62 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) ----
If you need correct position, just use a market |
|
Borubar 34 posts 2 years old |
on (1 year ago) Yes! Some randomness is fine, but let us have a say. At least let us choose between S/M and D/G. |
We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience. By using KickoffBoss, you agree to our Privacy Policy
We use cookies to improve your experience. Choose which types of cookies you want to allow:
Necessary for the website to function properly. Cannot be disabled.
Help us understand how you use our site (Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity).
Used for advertising and social media features (Meta Pixel).