Good morning everyone, I'm not arguing about the penalty, even though red cards and cautions have a rather strange variability, but it happens all too often that a player who commits a foul is injured himself. Now, it can happen because in reality, it only happens once a season, but that's it; it happens often to me. I think the formula needs to be revised, corrected, or the percentage of occurrence changed, or perhaps it was the other player who was injured, which rarely happens. I find it more common in the game for the person who commits the foul to get injured than the person who is the target. Even when playing Normal without hard tackles.
thanks
ps. Yesterday two game two case, it’s frequently
bearbeitet am · 2 Mal
villarreal87 Beiträge1 jahr alt
I also feel that it happens quite a lot compared to reality.
nicmo611 Beiträge4 jahre alt
your players are getting into "injury worth" duels with players that have higher natural fitness than yours, for this reason your player gets injured.
Thuru593 Beiträge2 jahre alt
nicmo
your players are getting into "injury worth" duels with players that have higher natural fitness than yours, for this reason your player gets injured.
@nicmo
good reason to train NF
Gablik16 Beiträge8 monate alt
nicmo
your players are getting into "injury worth" duels with players that have higher natural fitness than yours, for this reason your player gets injured.
@nicmo
Thanks for the reply, Nicmo. Now I understand why it happens so frequently. It seems a bit excessive, but it's a rule for everyone, and I'll stick with it.
I'd like to ask you:
- Does the comparison between NF to determine if a player is injured also apply to unpenalized fouls?
- Does the fact that a player makes light or normal tackles reduce the likelihood of an injury compared to making hard tackles?
Wir verwenden Cookies, um sicherzustellen, dass du die bestmögliche Erfahrung machst. Durch die Nutzung von KickoffBoss stimmst du unserer Datenschutzrichtlinie zu